[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd878b3a-ea02-49e0-9b5f-524e7fa1ecdf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:40:54 +0100
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, jgg@...dia.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, maz@...nel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: joro@...tes.org, shuah@...nel.org, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
yebin10@...wei.com, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
shivamurthy.shastri@...utronix.de, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de, yury.norov@...il.com, nipun.gupta@....com,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
jean-philippe@...aro.org, mdf@...nel.org, mshavit@...gle.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, smostafa@...gle.com, ddutile@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 05/13] iommu: Turn fault_data to iommufd private
pointer
On 1/11/25 4:32 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> A "fault_data" was added exclusively for the iommufd_fault_iopf_handler()
> used by IOPF/PRI use cases, along with the attach_handle. Now, the iommufd
> version of sw_msi function will resue the attach_handle and fault_data for
reuse
> a non-fault case.
>
> Rename "fault_data" to "iommufd_hwpt" so as not to confine it to a "fault"
> case. Move it into a union to be the iommufd private pointer. A following
> patch will move the iova_cookie to the union for dma-iommu too, after the
> iommufd_sw_msi implementation is added.
>
> Since we have two unions now, add some simple comments for readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 6 ++++--
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 423fdfa6b3bb..b6526d734f30 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -224,8 +224,10 @@ struct iommu_domain {
> phys_addr_t msi_addr);
> #endif
>
> - void *fault_data;
> - union {
> + union { /* Pointer usable by owner of the domain */
> + struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *iommufd_hwpt; /* iommufd */
> + };
> + union { /* Fault handler */
> struct {
> iommu_fault_handler_t handler;
> void *handler_token;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> index 1fe804e28a86..06aa83a75e94 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ int iommufd_fault_iopf_handler(struct iopf_group *group)
> struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt;
> struct iommufd_fault *fault;
>
> - hwpt = group->attach_handle->domain->fault_data;
> + hwpt = group->attach_handle->domain->iommufd_hwpt;
> fault = hwpt->fault;
>
> mutex_lock(&fault->mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> index ce03c3804651..f7c0d7b214b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> @@ -402,10 +402,10 @@ int iommufd_hwpt_alloc(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
> }
> hwpt->fault = fault;
> hwpt->domain->iopf_handler = iommufd_fault_iopf_handler;
> - hwpt->domain->fault_data = hwpt;
> refcount_inc(&fault->obj.users);
> iommufd_put_object(ucmd->ictx, &fault->obj);
> }
> + hwpt->domain->iommufd_hwpt = hwpt;
don't we want to reset this somewhere on release path?
Eric
>
> cmd->out_hwpt_id = hwpt->obj.id;
> rc = iommufd_ucmd_respond(ucmd, sizeof(*cmd));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists