[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b0f068c-26f7-455a-a546-65531cd7fe48@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 14:01:31 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks@...sung.com>
Cc: krzk@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
conor+dt@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
linux-fsd@...la.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, joabreu@...opsys.com, rcsekar@...sung.com,
ssiddha@...la.com, jayati.sahu@...sung.com,
pankaj.dubey@...sung.com, ravi.patel@...sung.com,
gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] net: stmmac: dwc-qos: Add FSD EQoS support
> > It looks like you should be able to share all the clk_bulk code with
> > tegra_eqos_probe(). The stmmac driver suffers from lots of cut/paste code
> > with no consolidation. You can at least not make the tegra code worse by
> > doing a little refactoring.
>
> Hi Andrew,
> Just to clarify, you were referring to refactoring tegra code to use
> clk_bulk APIs, right?
Yes.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists