linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] scsi: use GFP_NOIO to avoid circular locking dependency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250129104525.0ae8421e@fangorn>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:45:25 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Marc Aurèle La France <tsi@...oix.net>, "James E.J. Bottomley"
 <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: use GFP_NOIO to avoid circular locking dependency

On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 21:35:18 -0800
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> GFP_NOFS is never the right thing for block layer allocations.
> The right thing here is GFP_NOIO which is a superset of GFP_NOFS.
> Otherwise you could reproduce the same deadlock when using swap
> instead of a file system to reproduce basically the same deadlock.

Duh, you are right of course!

The fixed up patch with GFP_NOIO is below.

---8<---

From 74272b4537415fd7d94c216e422510c27aa88fa0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:35:39 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: use GFP_NOIO to avoid circular locking dependency
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Filesystems can write to disk from page reclaim with __GFP_FS
set. Marc found a case where scsi_realloc_sdev_budget_map
ends up in page reclaim with GFP_KERNEL, where it could try
to take filesystem locks again, leading to a deadlock.

WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.13.0 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/70 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8881025d5d78 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)){++++}-{0:0}, at: blk_mq_submit_bio+0x461/0x6e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff81ef5f40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x9f/0x760

The full lockdep splat can be found in Marc's report:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/1/24/1101

Avoid the potential deadlock by doing the allocation with GFP_NOIO,
which prevents both filesystem and block layer recursion.

Reported-by: Marc Aurèle La France <tsi@...oix.net>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
index f2093982b3db..b0964b6dd646 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int scsi_realloc_sdev_budget_map(struct scsi_device *sdev,
 	}
 	ret = sbitmap_init_node(&sdev->budget_map,
 				scsi_device_max_queue_depth(sdev),
-				new_shift, GFP_KERNEL,
+				new_shift, GFP_NOIO,
 				sdev->request_queue->node, false, true);
 	if (!ret)
 		sbitmap_resize(&sdev->budget_map, depth);
-- 
2.47.1