[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250130114615.6f591882.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 11:46:15 +0100
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>,
Tony Krowiak
<akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@...ux.ibm.com>,
Harald
Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
Holger Dengler
<dengler@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik
<gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian
Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle
<svens@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Halil Pasic
<pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: Replace one-element array with flexible
array member
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:30:30 +1030
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> On 30/01/25 07:08, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:18:59 +0100
> > Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >
> >> Replace the deprecated one-element array with a modern flexible array
> >> member in the struct ap_matrix_dev.
> >>
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand the value of this. What we have here is not
> > a flexible array but a one element array. Something that in the generic
> > case could be many but particularly for vfio-ap is always one.
>
> You are correct. Only fake flexible arrays should be transformed into
> C99 flex-array members [1].
>
> Thanks
> -Gustavo
>
> [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/908817/
>
Thanks! Alex, what do we do with this then? I think you picked it up
yesterday late. And I think, it might make sense to make this look
less like a fake flex-array...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists