[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250130112207.GA6617@strace.io>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:22:07 +0200
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io>
To: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@...il.com>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
strace-devel@...ts.strace.io, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Davide Berardi <berardi.dav@...il.com>,
Renzo Davoli <renzo@...unibo.it>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] syscall.h: add syscall_set_arguments() and
syscall_set_return_value()
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 09:33:03AM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...ace.io> writes:
>
> > These functions are going to be needed on all HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> > architectures to implement PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO API.
> >
> > This partially reverts commit 7962c2eddbfe ("arch: remove unused
> > function syscall_set_arguments()") by reusing some of old
> > syscall_set_arguments() implementations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...ace.io>
> > Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arc/include/asm/syscall.h | 14 +++++++++++
> > arch/arm/include/asm/syscall.h | 13 ++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 13 ++++++++++
> > arch/csky/include/asm/syscall.h | 13 ++++++++++
> > arch/hexagon/include/asm/syscall.h | 14 +++++++++++
> > arch/loongarch/include/asm/syscall.h | 8 ++++++
> > arch/mips/include/asm/syscall.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/nios2/include/asm/syscall.h | 11 ++++++++
> > arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h | 7 ++++++
> > arch/parisc/include/asm/syscall.h | 12 +++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h | 10 ++++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h | 9 +++++++
> > arch/s390/include/asm/syscall.h | 12 +++++++++
> > arch/sh/include/asm/syscall_32.h | 12 +++++++++
> > arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h | 10 ++++++++
> > arch/um/include/asm/syscall-generic.h | 14 +++++++++++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/xtensa/include/asm/syscall.h | 11 ++++++++
> > include/asm-generic/syscall.h | 16 ++++++++++++
> > 19 files changed, 267 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index 27e3d804b311..b3dd883699e7 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -78,6 +78,18 @@ static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> > args[0] = regs->orig_gpr2 & mask;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> > + struct pt_regs *regs,
> > + const unsigned long *args)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int n = 6;
> > +
> > + while (n-- > 0)
> > + if (n > 0)
> > + regs->gprs[2 + n] = args[n];
> > + regs->orig_gpr2 = args[0];
> > +}
>
> Could that be changed to something like:
>
> for (int n = 1; n < 6; n++)
> regs->gprs[2 + n] = args[n];
> regs->orig_gpr2 = args[0];
>
> I think this is way easier to parse.
I don't mind changing syscall_set_arguments() this way, but it just
mirrors syscall_get_arguments(), so I think it would be better if these
two functions were written in the same style. Would you like to change
syscall_get_arguments() as well?
--
ldv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists