[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJj2-QF1y1XNRYy9sT5c5=pi20+67Duf9B2Amatnu01HLmw06Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:15:08 -0800
From: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org, damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Kaiyang Zhao <kaiyang2@...cmu.edu>, Jiaming Yan <jiamingy@...zon.com>,
Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] DAMON Requirements for Access-aware MM of Future
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 7:06 PM Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net> wrote:
> 5) Scarce resources
>
> We need to be careful not to consume excessive amounts of resources
> in an attempt to track all these identifying mechanisms. Even 1 byte
> per folio is 256MB on a 1TB machine. This gets out of hand quick.
>
> With task-work, I was able to add no additional resource consumption,
> but deferring to a fully async scenario and needing to track things
> like last-accessing CPU, timestamps, and etc.
>
> We'll need to examine this closely if we decide to aggregate either
> of these mechanisms.
My concern with physical address space monitoring is fragmentation. I
ran some numbers on a few prod machines. Grouping by regions with the
same memcg and ignoring any unmapped memory to be generous, machines
with higher utilization can have a region/total pages ratio of ~40%,
and even those with lower utilization (<50%) can also reach 20%.
Accurately tracking these regions would require quite the region
metadata, on the order of GBs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists