[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d8d4fa6-66ef-48c1-b13a-607a70e476f4@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 11:30:43 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 14/14] ahci: sata_rcar: Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
guards to pm_sleep_ptr()
On 1/27/25 22:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 13:46, Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com> wrote:
>> Letting the compiler remove these functions when the kernel is built
>> without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP support is simpler and less error prone than the
>> use of #ifdef based kernel configuration guards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> The subsystem prefix is "ata", not "ahci" (not all ATA-drivers are
> AHCI-drivers).
Yep. The convention is:
ata: driver_name: xxx
So it would be:
ata: sata_rcar: Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep_ptr()
for this patch. And the same comment applies to all your other patches in the
series.
>
>> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c
>> @@ -927,7 +927,6 @@ static void sata_rcar_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> static int sata_rcar_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct ata_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> @@ -1005,7 +1004,6 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops sata_rcar_pm_ops = {
>> .poweroff = sata_rcar_suspend,
>> .restore = sata_rcar_restore,
>> };
>> -#endif
>
> If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled (e.g. m68k allyesconfig):
>
> drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c: In function ‘sata_rcar_suspend’:
> drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c:936:9: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘ata_host_suspend’; did you mean ‘sata_rcar_suspend’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 936 | ata_host_suspend(host, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | sata_rcar_suspend
> drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c: In function ‘sata_rcar_resume’:
> drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c:973:9: error: implicit declaration of
> function ‘ata_host_resume’; did you mean ‘sata_rcar_resume’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 973 | ata_host_resume(host);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | sata_rcar_resume
>
>>
>> static struct platform_driver sata_rcar_driver = {
>> .probe = sata_rcar_probe,
>> @@ -1013,9 +1011,7 @@ static struct platform_driver sata_rcar_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> .name = DRV_NAME,
>> .of_match_table = sata_rcar_match,
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> - .pm = &sata_rcar_pm_ops,
>> -#endif
>> + .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&sata_rcar_pm_ops),
>> },
>> };
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists