lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7f5--hzr0Y3eb1JNpfNqepJuE92yq3y8dzaL_mQF+U5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:34:09 -0800
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Weinan Liu <wnliu@...gle.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org, 
	joe.lawrence@...hat.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:59 AM Song Liu <song@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I missed this set before sending my RFC set. If this set works well, we
> won't need the other set. I will give this one a try.

I just realized that llvm doesn't support sframe yet. So we (Meta) still
need some sframe-less approach before llvm supports sframe.

IIRC, Google also uses llvm to compile the kernel. Weinan, would
you mind share your thoughts on how we can adopt this before
llvm supports sframe? (compile arm64 kernel with gcc?)

Thanks,
Song

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ