[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5vGqAxiaL_weoWU@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 08:36:24 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] kernfs: Use RCU to access
kernfs_node::{parent|name}.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 03:02:01PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This started as a bug report by Hillf Danton and aims to access
> kernfs_node::{name|parent} with RCU to avoid the lock during
> kernfs_path_from_node().
>
> I've split the individual fixes in separate patches (#1 to #4). I've
> also split the ::parent and ::name RCU conversation into a single patch
> (#5 and #6).
>
> v5…v6 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250128084226.1499291-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
> - s/rdt_kn_get_name/rdt_kn_name/
> - s/rdt_get_kn_parent_priv/rdt_kn_parent_priv/
> - s/kn_get_priv/kn_priv/
> - The comment, that has been removed in kernfs_put(), is back.
> - Using rcu_access_pointer() in kernfs_activate_one() and kernfs_dir_pos()
> instead of kernfs_parent() where the pointer is not dereferenced but
> just compared.
>
> v4…v5 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250124174614.866884-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
> - rdtgroup:
> - Add a comment to rdt_get_kn_parent_priv() regarding lifetime of
> parent.
> - Move individual rcu_dereference_check() invocations into
> rdt_kn_parent() with a comment on lifetime.
> - Use rcu_access_pointer() in kernfs_to_rdtgroup() instead
> rcu_dereference_check(, true)
> - s/kernfs_rcu_get_name/kernfs_rcu_name/
> - Move all rcu_dereference_check() within kernfs into kernfs_parent()
> and extend its checks to have all cases in one spot. Document why
> each case makes sense.
> - kernfs_notify_workfn(): Do unlocks in the reverse order of locks.
> - Add kernfs_root_flags() and use it in cgroup's kn_get_priv() to
> check the right KERNFS_ROOT_INVARIANT_PARENT flag.
>
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241121175250.EJbI7VMb@linutronix.de/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241112155713.269214-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241108222406.n5azgO98@linutronix.de/
Whole series looks good to me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists