linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Select NUMA_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf1f61468b47425ecf3728689bc9636ddd1d910e.1738302337.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:35:22 +0530
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, andrii@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        hawk@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com,
        song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, mykolal@...com, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Select NUMA_NO_NODE to create map

On powerpc, a CPU does not necessarily originate from NUMA node 0.
This contrasts with architectures like x86, where CPU 0 is not
hot-pluggable, making NUMA node 0 a consistently valid node.
This discrepancy can lead to failures when creating a map on NUMA
node 0, which is initialized by default, if no CPUs are allocated
from NUMA node 0.

This patch fixes the issue by setting NUMA_NO_NODE (-1) for map
creation for this selftest.

Fixes: 96eabe7a40aa ("bpf: Allow selecting numa node during map creation")
Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c
index cc184e442..67557cda2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bloom_filter_map.c
@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include "bloom_filter_map.skel.h"
 
+#ifndef NUMA_NO_NODE
+#define NUMA_NO_NODE	(-1)
+#endif
+
 static void test_fail_cases(void)
 {
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts);
@@ -69,6 +73,7 @@ static void test_success_cases(void)
 
 	/* Create a map */
 	opts.map_flags = BPF_F_ZERO_SEED | BPF_F_NUMA_NODE;
+	opts.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
 	fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER, NULL, 0, sizeof(value), 100, &opts);
 	if (!ASSERT_GE(fd, 0, "bpf_map_create bloom filter success case"))
 		return;
-- 
2.43.5