[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250131073023.GC16012@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 08:30:23 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] lockref: remove count argument of lockref_init
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:19:39PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:44 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > Maybe the lockref_init kerneldoc now needs to say that it's initialized
> > to a hold count of 1?
>
> I always feel a bit guilty when adding a comment like "Initializes
> @lockref->count to 1" and five lines further down in the code, it says
> 'lockref->count = 1'. But okay.
It reads a bit odd, but kerneldoc comments aren't just for the reader
of the code - they also get extraced into rendered documentation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists