[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cab05891-cfce-4d64-a05f-b90038d5ee9f@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:06:42 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@...ux.dev>, Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/12] mm/page_vma_mapped: device-private entries are
not migration entries
On 31.01.25 00:36, Alistair Popple wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:54:05PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> It's unclear why they would be considered migration entries; they are
>> not.
>
> Yeah, I agree that doesn't seem right. I suspect I was initially modelling
> device exclusive entries similar to migration entries but obviously went too
> far. So thanks for fixing:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Thanks ... fixing all the wrong use of "device-private" in the
subject+description ... not sure what my mind was doing there.
It's all about "device-exclusive" of course.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists