[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z5wr5h03oLEA5WBn@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 17:48:22 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, john.allen@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, joro@...tes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, michael.roth@....com,
dionnaglaze@...gle.com, nikunj@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
kevinloughlin@...gle.com, Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/amd: Enable Host SNP support after enabling
IOMMU SNP support
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> This patch fixes the current SNP host enabling code and effectively SNP
^^^^^^^^^^
> ---
> drivers/iommu/amd/init.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
> index c5cd92edada0..ee887aa4442f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
> @@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ static bool __init detect_ivrs(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static void iommu_snp_enable(void)
> +static __init void iommu_snp_enable(void)
If you're feeling nitpicky, adding "__init" could be done in a separate patch.
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV
> if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
> @@ -3219,6 +3219,11 @@ static void iommu_snp_enable(void)
> goto disable_snp;
> }
>
> + if (snp_rmptable_init()) {
> + pr_warn("SNP: RMP initialization failed, SNP cannot be supported.\n");
> + goto disable_snp;
> + }
> +
> pr_info("IOMMU SNP support enabled.\n");
> return;
>
> @@ -3426,18 +3431,23 @@ void __init amd_iommu_detect(void)
> int ret;
>
> if (no_iommu || (iommu_detected && !gart_iommu_aperture))
> - return;
> + goto disable_snp;
>
> if (!amd_iommu_sme_check())
> - return;
> + goto disable_snp;
>
> ret = iommu_go_to_state(IOMMU_IVRS_DETECTED);
> if (ret)
> - return;
> + goto disable_snp;
This handles initial failure, but it won't handle the case where amd_iommu_prepare()
fails, as the iommu_go_to_state() call from amd_iommu_enable() will get
short-circuited. I don't see any pleasant options. Maybe this?
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
index c5cd92edada0..436e47f13f8f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
@@ -3318,6 +3318,8 @@ static int __init iommu_go_to_state(enum iommu_init_state state)
ret = state_next();
}
+ if (ret && !amd_iommu_snp_en && cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
+ cc_platform_clear(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
return ret;
}
Somewhat of a side topic, what happens if the RMP is fully configured and _then_
IOMMU initialization fails? I.e. if amd_iommu_init_pci() or amd_iommu_enable_interrupts()
fails? Is that even survivable?
>
> amd_iommu_detected = true;
> iommu_detected = 1;
> x86_init.iommu.iommu_init = amd_iommu_init;
> + return;
> +
> +disable_snp:
> + if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP))
> + cc_platform_clear(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
> }
>
> /****************************************************************************
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists