[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4e31542-3534-4856-a90f-e47960ed0907@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:47:45 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@...ux.dev>, Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 3/3] net: stmmac: Specify hardware capability
value when FIFO size isn't specified
> > I'm guessing, but in your setup, i assume the value is never written
> > to a register, hence 0 is O.K. e.g. dwmac1000_dma_operation_mode_rx(),
> > the fifosz value is used to determine if flow control can be used, but
> > is otherwise ignored.
>
> I haven't traced the code, but that fits my assumptions too.
I could probably figure it out using code review, but do you know
which set of DMA operations your hardware uses? A quick look at
dwmac-rk.c i see:
/* If the stmmac is not already selected as gmac4,
* then make sure we fallback to gmac.
*/
if (!plat_dat->has_gmac4)
plat_dat->has_gmac = true;
Which suggests there are two variants of the RockChip MAC.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists