[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250131162031.190424-1-aha310510@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 01:20:31 +0900
From: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
To: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: fix incorrect pointer check in __bch2_subvolume_delete()
For some unknown reason, checks on struct bkey_s_c_snapshot and struct
bkey_s_c_snapshot_tree pointers are missing.
Therefore, I think it would be appropriate to fix the incorrect pointer checking
through this patch.
Fixes: 4bd06f07bcb5 ("bcachefs: Fixes for snapshot_tree.master_subvol")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
---
fs/bcachefs/subvolume.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/subvolume.c b/fs/bcachefs/subvolume.c
index e3d0475232e5..b7b96283c316 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/subvolume.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/subvolume.c
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int __bch2_subvolume_delete(struct btree_trans *trans, u32 subvolid)
bch2_bkey_get_iter_typed(trans, &snapshot_iter,
BTREE_ID_snapshots, POS(0, snapid),
0, snapshot);
- ret = bkey_err(subvol);
+ ret = bkey_err(snapshot);
bch2_fs_inconsistent_on(bch2_err_matches(ret, ENOENT), trans->c,
"missing snapshot %u", snapid);
if (ret)
@@ -440,6 +440,11 @@ static int __bch2_subvolume_delete(struct btree_trans *trans, u32 subvolid)
bch2_bkey_get_iter_typed(trans, &snapshot_tree_iter,
BTREE_ID_snapshot_trees, POS(0, treeid),
0, snapshot_tree);
+ ret = bkey_err(snapshot_tree);
+ bch2_fs_inconsistent_on(bch2_err_matches(ret, ENOENT), trans->c,
+ "missing snapshot tree %u", treeid);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
if (le32_to_cpu(snapshot_tree.v->master_subvol) == subvolid) {
struct bkey_i_snapshot_tree *snapshot_tree_mut =
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists