[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DM3PR11MB8736E9F1A872A0E483E6328EECE82@DM3PR11MB8736.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:21:38 +0000
From: <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <olteanv@...il.com>, <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/2] net: pcs: xpcs: Add special code to
operate in Microchip KSZ9477 switch
> > As I mentioned before, the IP used in KSZ9477 is old and so may not match
> > the behavior in current DesignWare specifications.
>
> Can you tell us the exact revision? Now that Synopsys have said they
> will try to answer questions, they should have access to all the
> versions of the data book, and can do comparisons between revisions.
I will try to get the information from hardware designers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists