linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z50NipTu1jGT8pur@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 19:51:06 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:25:20PM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:22 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> > Can you explain what you mean by using -M -C? The formatting was done
> > by hand, is there an automated tool? I tried using clang-format but
> > the result was a change on almost every line.
> >
> > Note also that though it looks like a lot of formatting has changed,
> > in reality almost every changed line has non-formatting changes due to
> > passing `test` around.
> 
> Ah, you were referring to git format-patch. Sure, if you'd like me to
> rename the file, I'll use those flags in v2.

Yes.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko