[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9ke8XeOimhMM4tkYgjUoLCx9nU6Sk=ypvEh4Eg=tjCpPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 14:58:54 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:58 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:50 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:22:39PM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:47:49AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > There are other options like CONFIG_TEST_PRINTF or so in defconfig files.
> > Why are they there to begin with? The answer to this Q will affect the change
> > you have done in this patch.
>
> CONFIG_TEST_PRINTF still exists; that test has not been converted to kunit.
Ah, sorry, I had misunderstood your question. These were there to
enable those tests; when the tests are ported to KUnit this is no
longer necessary because of the presence of CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists