linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] gpiolib: add gpiods_set_array_value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2715ead8-cf6d-4b44-b6e3-343cb6489eca@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 14:51:52 -0600
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
 Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
 Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] gpiolib: add gpiods_set_array_value_cansleep

On 1/31/25 2:38 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> So I'm proposing that we add a gpiods_set_array_value_cansleep()
>> function that is a wrapper around gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep()
>> that has struct gpio_descs as the first parameter to make it a bit
>> easier to read the code and avoid the hard-coding temptation.
>  
> This looks reasonable.
> 
> How do you plan to get it merged, since you cross a lot of subsystems
> here.
> 
> 	Andrew

Since these are mostly small changes and most of the touched drivers aren't
seeing much action, I think it would be OK for as much as possible to go through
the GPIO tree.

We might need an immutable branch from that though since I know that iio: adc:
ad7606 is currently being actively worked on.

If there are any patches leftover that don't get acked to go through the GPIO
tree, I can resubmit them after the next kernel release cycle since none of
this is urgent anyway.