[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f604280-f4dd-494f-9f54-83e8f613b64f@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:31:18 -0600
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...libre.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] iio: adc: ad7606: change r/w_register signature
On 1/29/25 5:03 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> From: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
>
> The register read/write with IIO backend will require to claim the
> direct mode, and doing so requires passing the corresponding iio_dev
> structure.
> So we need to modify the function signature to pass the iio_dev
> structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
> ---
I don't think calling iio_device_claim_direct_mode() inside there reg_read/write
functions is the right place to do that. It should be done at a higher level (in
case we need to combine multiple reads/writes in an atomic operation). So I
think we should drop this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists