linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: support for 32-bit s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250201101931.GF5849@1wt.eu>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 11:19:31 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: support for 32-bit s390

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 07:43:44PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Support for 32-bit s390 is very easy to implement and useful for
> testing. For example I used to test some generic compat_ptr() logic,
> which is only testable on 32-bit s390.
> 
> The series depends on my other series
> "selftests/nolibc: test kernel configuration cleanups".
> (It's not a hard dependency, only a minor diff conflict)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>

I'm generally fine with the series from the nolibc perspective. I've
added Sven in Cc in case he wants to double-check anything, given that
he initially contributed the s390 support.

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>

Thanks!
Willy