[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250201131445.12ceb7e9@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 13:14:45 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alexandru
Ardelean <aardelean@...libre.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guillaume Stols
<gstols@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] iio: adc: ad7606: add support for writing
registers when using backend
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:03:11 +0100
Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com> wrote:
> From: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
>
> Add the logic for effectively enabling the software mode for the
> iio-backend, i.e. enabling the software mode channel configuration and
> implementing the register writing functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
> Co-developed-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
A few trivial things inline.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c
> index 64733b607aa8..19d93ae49e1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>
> -static int ad7606_bi_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const unsigned long *scan_mask)
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ad7606b_bi_sw_channels[] = {
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(0),
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(1),
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(2),
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(3),
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(4),
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(5),
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(6),
> + AD7606_BI_SW_CHANNEL(7),
> +};
> +
> +static int ad7606_par_bus_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + const unsigned long *scan_mask)
> {
> struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> unsigned int c, ret;
> @@ -48,7 +61,8 @@ static int ad7606_bi_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const unsigned
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int ad7606_bi_setup_iio_backend(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +static int ad7606_par_bus_setup_iio_backend(struct device *dev,
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> unsigned int ret, c;
> @@ -86,9 +100,56 @@ static int ad7606_bi_setup_iio_backend(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev *indio
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ad7606_par_bus_reg_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int addr)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int val, ret;
> + struct ad7606_platform_data *pdata = st->dev->platform_data;
Bonus space before st that shouldn't be there.
I'd also reorder this to have int val, ret last.
> +
> + ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = pdata->bus_reg_read(st->back, addr, &val);
> +
> + iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad7606_par_bus_reg_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + unsigned int addr, unsigned int val)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct ad7606_platform_data *pdata = st->dev->platform_data;
Same bonus space.
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = pdata->bus_reg_write(st->back, addr, val);
> +
> + iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists