[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6f48c9cb8b7981fd037a19a8cfbba5def40f2ea.1738439839.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 12:58:02 -0700
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
To: daniel@...earbox.net,
eddyz87@...il.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
andrii@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org
Cc: mykolal@...com,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mhartmay@...ux.ibm.com,
iii@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: selftests: Test constant key extraction on irrelevant maps
Test that very high constant map keys are not interpreted as an error
value by the verifier. This would previously fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
index 29eb9568633f..0a187ff725cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c
@@ -713,4 +713,19 @@ unsigned int non_stack_key_lookup(void)
return val->index;
}
+SEC("socket")
+__description("doesn't reject UINT64_MAX as s64 for irrelevant maps")
+__success __retval(42)
+unsigned int doesnt_reject_irrelevant_maps(void)
+{
+ __u64 key = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
+ struct test_val *val;
+
+ val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&map_hash_48b, &key);
+ if (val)
+ return val->index;
+
+ return 42;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists