linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c06056b4-db8a-4c0b-b061-aa596d3519f8@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:17:36 -0600
From: Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, brgl@...ev.pl,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, minyard@....org, robh@...nel.org,
        krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, joel@....id.au, andrew@...econstruct.com.au,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, eajames@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for the review.


>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>
> You still need to fix the subject. Why patch #1 has bindings but patch
> #2 dt-bindings? Why can't this be consistent?

What is preferred now a days? bindings or dt-bindings?

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Ninad