linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6271c4e0-de99-4d40-a147-8f742edcb362@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 17:01:53 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>, brgl@...ev.pl,
 linus.walleij@...aro.org, minyard@....org, robh@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, joel@....id.au, andrew@...econstruct.com.au,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, eajames@...ux.ibm.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf

On 03/02/2025 16:17, Ninad Palsule wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> 
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>
>> You still need to fix the subject. Why patch #1 has bindings but patch
>> #2 dt-bindings? Why can't this be consistent?
> 
> What is preferred now a days? bindings or dt-bindings?
dt-bindings. nowadays? submitting patches asks for this since 2018.

Best regards,
Krzysztof