[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6272997d-1216-47ba-a26a-4741162b1002@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:11:47 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
MaĆra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: dummy: convert to use the faux bus
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 04:46:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:39:06PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:25:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > The dummy regulator driver does not need to create a platform device, it
> > > only did so because it was simple to do. Change it over to use the
> > > faux bus instead as this is NOT a real platform device, and it makes
> > > the code even smaller than before.
> > No, they did this because you explicitly asked that this be done....
> I did? What was it attempting to be before this? I don't remember that
> at all, sorry.
Yeah, there were some things where people were creating custom buses for
internal uses like this which you pushed back on due to code duplication
- you said to just use platform bus since the bus code looked identical.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists