lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250203162617.sstmdvv7d3k53izf@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 21:56:17 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
	konradybcio@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
	dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, quic_nsekar@...cinc.com,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
	Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add PCIe related nodes

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:04:10PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> From: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
> 
> Add phy and controller nodes for pcie0_x1 and pcie1_x2.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>

One minor comment below.


[...]

> +			assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE3X2_AUX_CLK>,
> +					<&gcc GCC_PCIE3X2_AXI_M_CLK>,
> +					<&gcc GCC_PCIE3X2_AXI_S_BRIDGE_CLK>,
> +					<&gcc GCC_PCIE3X2_AXI_S_CLK>,
> +					<&gcc GCC_PCIE3X2_RCHG_CLK>;
> +
> +			assigned-clock-rates = <2000000>,
> +						<266666666>,
> +						<240000000>,
> +						<240000000>,
> +						<100000000>;
> +

Does the drivers really need to set clock rate for these many clocks?

No, as per the reply to my similar question to IPQ5424:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/9206e44c-da4f-4bdb-850f-fac511f4ddc7@quicinc.com/

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ