[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6EBdDbMZqh+9NOL@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:48:36 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
CC: <will@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <jgg@...dia.com>,
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <maz@...nel.org>,
<alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <joro@...tes.org>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
<reinette.chatre@...el.com>, <yebin10@...wei.com>, <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
<shivamurthy.shastri@...utronix.de>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<anna-maria@...utronix.de>, <yury.norov@...il.com>, <nipun.gupta@....com>,
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
<jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <mdf@...nel.org>, <mshavit@...gle.com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <smostafa@...gle.com>,
<ddutile@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 05/13] iommu: Turn fault_data to iommufd private
pointer
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:40:54PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 1/11/25 4:32 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > A "fault_data" was added exclusively for the iommufd_fault_iopf_handler()
> > used by IOPF/PRI use cases, along with the attach_handle. Now, the iommufd
> > version of sw_msi function will resue the attach_handle and fault_data for
> reuse
Ack.
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> > index ce03c3804651..f7c0d7b214b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> > @@ -402,10 +402,10 @@ int iommufd_hwpt_alloc(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
> > }
> > hwpt->fault = fault;
> > hwpt->domain->iopf_handler = iommufd_fault_iopf_handler;
> > - hwpt->domain->fault_data = hwpt;
> > refcount_inc(&fault->obj.users);
> > iommufd_put_object(ucmd->ictx, &fault->obj);
> > }
> > + hwpt->domain->iommufd_hwpt = hwpt;
> don't we want to reset this somewhere on release path?
We do iommu_domain_free() entirely on HWPT's release path.
This basically sets the domain's "owner data" as Jason remarked:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250113164037.GO5556@nvidia.com/
Thanks
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists