linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/backlight: Return immediately when scale() finds invalid parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z6ETg52NDLC3Zhr6@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:05:39 -0500
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin
	<tursulin@...ulin.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter
	<simona@...ll.ch>, <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Shevchenko
	<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/backlight: Return immediately when scale()
 finds invalid parameters

On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 06:28:08AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/2/25 05:27, David Laight wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:15:09 -0800
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 14:59, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I'm pushing this soon to drm-intel-next, unless Linus want to take
> > > > this one directly to his tree
> > > 
> > > Let's just go through the proper channels and go through the drm tree.
> > > 
> > > Unless I've issed something, I think this is only an active issue on
> > > parisc (and only with certain compiler versions at that), so it isn't
> > > some super-urgent thing that needs to be expedited.
> > 
> > It probably wants pushing into rc-2.
> > The build bot is complaining again.
> > 
> 
> The patch didn't make it into linux-next (as of next-20250131).
> I assume it either got lost or it was dropped for some reason.

I'm sorry for missing that for our -rc1 cycle. It is now queued for -rc2

> 
> Guenter
>