[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250203142505.GH7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:25:05 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] preempt: Add a generic function to return the
preemption string.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:16:23PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The individual architectures often add the preemption model to the begin
> of the backtrace. This is the case on X86 or ARM64 for the "die" case
> but not for regular warning. With the addition of DYNAMIC_PREEMPT for
> PREEMPT_RT we end up with CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT set
> simultaneously. That means that everyone who tried to add that piece of
> information gets it wrong for PREEMPT_RT because PREEMPT is checked
> first.
>
> This series adds a generic helper which is used by
> dump_stack_print_info() and other architectures which don't use the
> function and provide this information on their own.
>
> RFC…v2 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206113431.Q-VXMlru@linutronix.de/
> - Split into individual patches.
> - Implement preempt_model_str() based on feedback by Peter Zijlstra
> and Steven Rostedt.
>
> Sebastian
>
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (9):
> sched: Add a generic function to return the preemption string.
> lib/dump_stack: Use preempt_model_str().
> arm: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
> arm64: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
> powerpc: Use preempt_model_str().
> s390: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
> x86: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
> xtensa: Use preempt_model_str().
> tracing: Use preempt_model_str().
Works for me; how do we want to go about merging this?
I can take it through the sched tree I suppose, once the various arch
people have blessed it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists