lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250203142505.GH7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:25:05 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] preempt: Add a generic function to return the
 preemption string.

On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 03:16:23PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The individual architectures often add the preemption model to the begin
> of the backtrace. This is the case on X86 or ARM64 for the "die" case
> but not for regular warning. With the addition of DYNAMIC_PREEMPT for
> PREEMPT_RT we end up with CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT set
> simultaneously. That means that everyone who tried to add that piece of
> information gets it wrong for PREEMPT_RT because PREEMPT is checked
> first.
> 
> This series adds a generic helper which is used by
> dump_stack_print_info() and other architectures which don't use the
> function and provide this information on their own.
> 
> RFC…v2 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206113431.Q-VXMlru@linutronix.de/
>   - Split into individual patches.
>   - Implement preempt_model_str() based on feedback by Peter Zijlstra
>     and Steven Rostedt.
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (9):
>   sched: Add a generic function to return the preemption string.
>   lib/dump_stack: Use preempt_model_str().
>   arm: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
>   arm64: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
>   powerpc: Use preempt_model_str().
>   s390: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
>   x86: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
>   xtensa: Use preempt_model_str().
>   tracing: Use preempt_model_str().

Works for me; how do we want to go about merging this?

I can take it through the sched tree I suppose, once the various arch
people have blessed it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ