[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <974a03d2-3f3f-4be2-9dba-ece6dca8015e@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 08:20:16 -0800
From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: cocci@...ia.fr, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [cocci] [PATCH v2 1/3] coccinelle: misc: secs_to_jiffies: Patch
expressions too
On 2/3/2025 11:56 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Teach the script to suggest conversions for timeout patterns where the
>> arguments to msecs_to_jiffies() are expressions as well.
> How do you imagine that the shown SmPL code fits ever to patch reviews?
By the simple fact of accomplishing the same result despite differences in
code style, as explicitly called out in the changelog.
- Easwar (he/him)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists