[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bjvhhdf2.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:39:45 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Move "debugging" section to the top in index.rst
Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com> writes:
> Move the "debugging" entry to the top in Documentation/trace/index.rst.
> Turn index.rst into a good starting point for people wanting to learn
> about tracing. Make it the first document users see, as it serves as a
> tracing tutorial
>
> Signed-off-by: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/trace/index.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
> index 2c991dc96ace..f3d235c8438b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Linux Tracing Technologies
> .. toctree::
> :maxdepth: 2
>
> + debugging
> ftrace-design
> tracepoint-analysis
> ftrace
> @@ -24,7 +25,6 @@ Linux Tracing Technologies
> histogram
> histogram-design
> boottime-trace
> - debugging
> hwlat_detector
> osnoise-tracer
So I totally approve of improving our index.rst files. Without some
occasional maintenance, they become unorganized dumping grounds, and
Documentation/trace appears to be no exception.
This small change does not really help, though. Could I please
encourage you to consider bringing some real order to this page? As an
example, you could look at commit 270beb5b2aae from 6.13.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists