[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6edcf7f8-d496-524e-2250-49284dfb55e4@maine.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:41:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: move all of the pmu devices into their own
location
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> It seems that the majority of the perf code IS looking in the correct
> place, just mem-events.c seemed wrong.
I hate to tell you, but other places in userspace are depending on the
current setup. libpfm4, used by PAPI, is looking directly in /sys/devices
for pmus and will break with the changes you are planning.
Vince Weaver
vincent.weaver@...ne.edu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists