[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250204165357.GA277200@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:53:57 -0500
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: Simplify return statement in dct_ecc_enabled()
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 02:09:54PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Simplify the return statement to improve the code's readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
> ---
> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> index 8414ceb43e4a..1f106b4fafdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> @@ -3355,10 +3355,7 @@ static bool dct_ecc_enabled(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>
> edac_dbg(3, "Node %d: DRAM ECC %s.\n", nid, (ecc_en ? "enabled" : "disabled"));
>
> - if (!ecc_en || !nb_mce_en)
> - return false;
> - else
> - return true;
> + return ecc_en && nb_mce_en;
> }
>
> static bool umc_ecc_enabled(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
> --
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists