linux-kernel - Re: [cocci] [v2 1/3] coccinelle: misc: secs_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3b1ecdf-0bf0-4053-8bbf-ecaff4e8cb62@web.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 21:24:05 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>, cocci@...ia.fr,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn>,
 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
 Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
 ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [cocci] [v2 1/3] coccinelle: misc: secs_to_jiffies: Patch
 expressions too

>> How do you imagine that the shown SmPL code fits ever to patch reviews?
>
> By the simple fact of accomplishing the same result despite differences in
> code style, as explicitly called out in the changelog.
Do any other contributors care more for the mentioned software development concerns?

How do you think about helping to improve affected implementation details?

Regards,
Markus