[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <835481c6-0ac1-47a7-84b2-fa5a135186c2@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:55:57 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Artem Chernyshev <artem.chernyshev@...-soft.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/10] net: pktgen: enable 'param=value'
parsing
On 2/3/25 6:01 PM, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> Enable additional to 'parm value' the 'param=value' parsing
It could be language bias on my side, by I find the above statement hard
to parse. Could you please rephrase it?
IMHO something alike:
"""
Enable more flexible parameters syntax, allowing "param=value" in
addition to the already supported "param value" pattern.
"""
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists