lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b07a4b44-b76f-4691-ac01-6e91b6b83672@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:56:26 -0800
From: steven chen <chenste@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, stefanb@...ux.ibm.com,
 roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
 eric.snowberg@...cle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
 code@...icks.com, bauermann@...abnow.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
 kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com,
 James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and
 excute

On 2/3/2025 4:50 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-02-03 at 15:25 -0800, steven chen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The below is the correct version for review.
>>
>> [PATCH v7 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and excute
>> <
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20250203232033.64123-1-chenste@linux.microso
>> ft.com/T/#t>
>>
>> Please ignore the this version because patch 5 is missing.
>>
>> I am really sorry to have troubled you.
> Thanks, Steven.  I was able to apply the patch set to v6.13.  For some reason, b4
> downloads a duplicate 4/7 patch.
>
> Mimi

Hi Mimi,

Please use the one below

[PATCH v7 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and excute 
<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20250203232033.64123-1-chenste@linux.microsoft.com/T/#t>

Please ignore the this version because patch 5 is missing.

I am really sorry.

Steven


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ