[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qvwe46oojvk2njtotvsvvs6a4nbluic566mn7hykqc6uu2pdll@rrkvzms6jti3>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:20:24 -0600
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@...khorst.se>
CC: <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, David Lechner
<dlechner@...libre.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Will Deacon
<will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng
<boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-resent-to-correct-ml 2/8] drm/xe/gt: Unify
xe_hw_fence_irq_finish() calls.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>Those calls should be from xe_gt_init, not the diverse amount of places
>they are called.
>
>Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@...khorst.se>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
>index 01a4a852b8f43..943bab94119fa 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
>@@ -408,13 +408,11 @@ static void dump_pat_on_error(struct xe_gt *gt)
> static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> unsigned int fw_ref;
>- int err, i;
>+ int err;
>
> fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
>- if (!fw_ref) {
>- err = -ETIMEDOUT;
>- goto err_hw_fence_irq;
>- }
>+ if (!fw_ref)
>+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> if (!xe_gt_is_media_type(gt)) {
> err = xe_ggtt_init(gt_to_tile(gt)->mem.ggtt);
>@@ -455,9 +453,6 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> err_force_wake:
> dump_pat_on_error(gt);
> xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
>-err_hw_fence_irq:
>- for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
>- xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(>->fence_irq[i]);
>
> return err;
> }
>@@ -465,7 +460,7 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> unsigned int fw_ref;
>- int err, i;
>+ int err;
>
> fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
> if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)) {
>@@ -543,8 +538,6 @@ static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>
> err_force_wake:
> xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
>- for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
>- xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(>->fence_irq[i]);
>
> return err;
> }
the two parts above should be fine and is similar to what I've sent on
my probe cleanup:
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/20250131223140.4144292-7-lucas.demarchi@intel.com/
>@@ -596,35 +589,39 @@ int xe_gt_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>
> err = xe_gt_pagefault_init(gt);
> if (err)
>- return err;
>+ goto err;
>
> xe_mocs_init_early(gt);
>
> err = xe_gt_sysfs_init(gt);
> if (err)
>- return err;
>+ goto err;
>
> err = gt_fw_domain_init(gt);
> if (err)
>- return err;
>+ goto err;
>
> err = xe_gt_idle_init(>->gtidle);
> if (err)
>- return err;
>+ goto err;
>
> err = xe_gt_freq_init(gt);
> if (err)
>- return err;
>+ goto err;
>
> xe_force_wake_init_engines(gt, gt_to_fw(gt));
>
> err = all_fw_domain_init(gt);
> if (err)
>- return err;
>+ goto err;
>
> xe_gt_record_user_engines(gt);
>
> return 0;
>+err:
>+ for (i = 0; i < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; ++i)
>+ xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(>->fence_irq[i]);
>+ return err;
this however is moving to the opposite direction from
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/20250131223140.4144292-6-lucas.demarchi@intel.com/
Lucas De Marchi
> }
>
> /**
>--
>2.47.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists