lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08a51873-7510-4552-9bb1-3ea7ef9fbc2d@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:35:44 +0100
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Paul Gazzillo <paul@...zz.com>,
 Necip Fazil Yildiran <fazilyildiran@...il.com>,
 oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
 "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HUGETLBFS
 when selected by PPC_8xx



Le 05/02/2025 à 03:39, Miaohe Lin a écrit :
> On 2025/1/24 6:24, kernel test robot wrote:
>> tree:   https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux.git&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757464439%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LU9lidWjjJE3vf0TPBp1wIvUFpjnpPKq2zQVxu4Ru%2F0%3D&reserved=0 master
>> head:   d0d106a2bd21499901299160744e5fe9f4c83ddb
>> commit: f8142cf94d4737ea0c3baffb3b9bad8addcb9b6b hugetlb: make hugetlb depends on SYSFS or SYSCTL
>> date:   2 years, 4 months ago
>> config: powerpc-kismet-CONFIG_HUGETLBFS-CONFIG_PPC_8xx-0-0 (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdownload.01.org%2F0day-ci%2Farchive%2F20250124%2F202501240611.LDmD2nkj-lkp%40intel.com%2Fconfig&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757478112%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9%2B4B2T41tw4xvlAkYIeOEhK9PrH17GM7KrhEOyKDxMM%3D&reserved=0)
>> reproduce: (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdownload.01.org%2F0day-ci%2Farchive%2F20250124%2F202501240611.LDmD2nkj-lkp%40intel.com%2Freproduce&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757485680%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=SDjSwdEccwtqN8L4VzuYnAhq3nchpJdBi%2FaJGloeZ40%3D&reserved=0)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> | Closes: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Foe-kbuild-all%2F202501240611.LDmD2nkj-lkp%40intel.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C9284805dd2a148bd1d7e08dd458e511f%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638743199757493154%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DdGGMh1x6g6a%2F7hcgqmSBASk14QpA4%2F%2FmI2ztozklts%3D&reserved=0
> 
> Thanks for report. Sorry for late respond. I was on my Spring Festival vacation.
> 
>>
>> kismet warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>>> kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HUGETLBFS when selected by PPC_8xx
>>     WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HUGETLBFS
>>       Depends on [n]: (X86 || IA64 || SPARC64 || ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS [=y] || BROKEN [=n]) && (SYSFS [=n] || SYSCTL [=n])
>>       Selected by [y]:
>>       - PPC_8xx [=y] && <choice>
> 
> I am a bit confused. HUGETLBFS depends on SYSFS or SYSCTL. How can it be selected while SYSFS [=n] || SYSCTL [=n]?
> Or am I miss something?

CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is selected by CONFIG_PPC_8xx, see commit 34536d780683 
("powerpc/8xx: Add a function to early map kernel via huge pages")

Christophe


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ