lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6OaKXsPuyl2hO0J@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:04:41 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vschneid@...hat.com, leitao@...ian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC context_tracking] Make RCU watch
 ct_kernel_exit_state() warning

Le Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 10:44:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> The WARN_ON_ONCE() in ct_kernel_exit_state() follows the call to
> ct_state_inc(), which means that RCU is not watching this WARN_ON_ONCE().
> This can (and does) result in extraneous lockdep warnings when this
> WARN_ON_ONCE() triggers.  These extraneous warnings are the opposite
> of helpful.
> 
> Therefore, invert the WARN_ON_ONCE() condition and move it before the
> call to ct_state_inc().  This does mean that the ct_state_inc() return
> value can no longer be used in the WARN_ON_ONCE() condition, so discard
> this return value and instead use a call to rcu_is_watching_curr_cpu().
> This call is executed only in CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y kernels, so there
> is no added overhead in production use.
> 
> Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>


> 
> diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c
> index 938c48952d26..fb5be6e9b423 100644
> --- a/kernel/context_tracking.c
> +++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c
> @@ -80,17 +80,16 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_task_trace_heavyweight_exit(void)
>   */
>  static noinstr void ct_kernel_exit_state(int offset)
>  {
> -	int seq;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * CPUs seeing atomic_add_return() must see prior RCU read-side
>  	 * critical sections, and we also must force ordering with the
>  	 * next idle sojourn.
>  	 */
>  	rcu_task_trace_heavyweight_enter();  // Before CT state update!
> -	seq = ct_state_inc(offset);
> -	// RCU is no longer watching.  Better be in extended quiescent state!
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && (seq & CT_RCU_WATCHING));
> +	// RCU is still watching.  Better not be in extended quiescent state!
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && !rcu_is_watching_curr_cpu());
> +	(void)ct_state_inc(offset);
> +	// RCU is no longer watching.
>  }
>  
>  /*

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ