[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250205173824.GJ554665@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:38:24 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Provide FIFO sizes for
DWMAC 1000
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:45:17AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 5:43 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:13:59 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > Since a fix for stmmac in general has already been sent [1] and a revert
> > > was also proposed [2], I'll refrain from sending mine.
> >
> > No, no, please do. You need to _submit_ the revert like a normal patch.
> > With all the usual details in the commit message.
>
> Mine isn't a revert, but simply downgrading the error to a warning.
> So... yet another workaround approach.
I think the point is that someone needs to formally
submit the revert. And I assume it should target the net tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists