[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccd67fd2-268a-4e83-9491-e401fa57229c@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:50:19 -0500
From: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: A path forward to cleaning up dying cgroups?
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
On 2/5/25 12:48, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> I was just curious as to what the status of the issue described in [1]
> is. It appears that the last time someone took a stab at it was in [2].
>
> Though it seems like there has been relative silence regarding it since
> then. So, has there been any discussion regarding the issue since then
> and does anyone know if there is consensus on how we should go about
> resolving this issue within the kernel?
>
> BR,
> Hamza
>
> [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/895431/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621125658.64935-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists