lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ebbd6d9-149f-43cb-b188-bd3a6125654f@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:00:54 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
 "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: critical health condition

On 2/4/25 6:31 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> +static ssize_t critical_health_show(struct device *dev,
> +				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", hba->dev_info.critical_health);
> +}

Hi Avri,

My understanding is that the UFS 4.1 standard supports reporting a
critical health event repeatedly while this patch does not allow users
to figure out whether a critical event has been reported once or
repeatedly. Has it been considered to report the number of times a
critical health event has been reported by a UFS device instead of only
one bit of information?

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ