linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] perf test: perf record tests (114) changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <173878079824.596119.8970944890321793548.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 10:39:58 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
 acme@...nel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, james.clark@...aro.org, 
 Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, 
 hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] perf test: perf record tests (114) changes

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:27:54 +0100, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Change event intructions to cycles for subtests
>  - precise_max attribute
>  - Basic leader sampling
> as event instructions can not be used for sampling on s390.
> 
> Thomas Richter (2):
>   perf test: Fix perf test 114 perf record test subtest precise_max
>   perf test: Change event in perf test 114 perf record test subtest
>     test_leader_sampling
> 
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Best regards,
Namhyung