[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0836dfe1-f497-4d46-b93f-a7362b8c61aa@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:37:21 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Sergey Lisov <sleirsgoevy@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regulator: dt-bindings: add documentation for
s2mpu05-pmic regulators
On 05/02/2025 21:06, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
> On 2025-02-05 08:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> + This is a part of device tree bindings for S2M and S5M family of Power
>>> + Management IC (PMIC).
>>> +
>>> + The S2MPU05 provides buck and LDO regulators.
>>> +
>>> + See also Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/samsung,s2mps11.yaml for
>>> + additional information and example.
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> + # 21 LDOs
>>> + "^LDO([1-9]|10|2[0-9]|3[0-5])$":
>>
>> Why is there a gap in LDOs?
>
> LDOs 11-24 are not implemented in the downstream kernel driver. On further
> inspection I was able to find the register addresses, but minimum voltage
> and step values are unknown. :(
I see, there are marked for CP. Add a comment that gap in LDOs is due to
lack of datasheet and lack of control by OS.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists