[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de31971e-98fc-4baf-8f4f-09d153902e2e@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:54:05 +0530
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org, gourry@...rry.net, nehagholkar@...a.com,
abhishekd@...a.com, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, nphamcs@...il.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, feng.tang@...el.com, kbusch@...a.com,
Hasan.Maruf@....com, sj@...nel.org, david@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org,
k.shutemov@...il.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, vbabka@...e.cz,
hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, shy828301@...il.com,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, shivankg@....com, ziy@...dia.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
AneeshKumar.KizhakeVeetil@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jon.grimm@....com, santosh.shukla@....com, Michael.Day@....com,
riel@...riel.com, weixugc@...gle.com, leesuyeon0506@...il.com,
honggyu.kim@...com, leillc@...gle.com, kmanaouil.dev@...il.com,
rppt@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Unifying sources of page temperature
information - what info is actually wanted?
On 31-Jan-25 6:39 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:28:03 +0000
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>>> Here is the list of potential discussion points:
>> ...
>>
>>> 2. Possibility of maintaining single source of truth for page hotness that would
>>> maintain hot page information from multiple sources and let other sub-systems
>>> use that info.
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was thinking of proposing a separate topic on a single source of hotness,
>> but this question covers it so I'll add some thoughts here instead.
>> I think we are very early, but sharing some experience and thoughts in a
>> session may be useful.
>
> Thinking more on this over lunch, I think it is worth calling this out as a
> potential session topic in it's own right rather than trying to find
> time within other sessions. Hence the title change.
>
> I think a session would start with a brief listing of the temperature sources
> we have and those on the horizon to motivate what we are unifying, then
> discussion to focus on need for such a unification + requirements
> (maybe with a straw man).
Here is a compilation of available temperature sources and how the
hot/access data is consumed by different subsystems:
PA-Physical address available
VA-Virtual address available
AA-Access time available
NA-accessing Node info available
I have left the slot blank for those which I am not sure about.
==================================================
Temperature PA VA AA NA
source
==================================================
PROT_NONE faults Y Y Y Y
--------------------------------------------------
folio_mark_accessed() Y Y Y
--------------------------------------------------
PTE A bit Y Y N N
--------------------------------------------------
Platform hints Y Y Y Y
(AMD IBS)
--------------------------------------------------
Device hints Y
(CXL HMU)
==================================================
And here is an attempt to compile how different subsystems
use the above data:
==============================================================
Source Subsystem Consumption
==============================================================
PROT_NONE faults NUMAB NUMAB=1 locality based
via process pgtable balancing
walk NUMAB=2 hot page
promotion
==============================================================
folio_mark_accessed() FS/filemap/GUP LRU list activation
==============================================================
PTE A bit via Reclaim:LRU LRU list activation,
rmap walk deactivation/demotion
==============================================================
PTE A bit via Reclaim:MGLRU LRU list activation,
rmap walk and process deactivation/demotion
pgtable walk
==============================================================
PTE A bit via DAMON LRU activation,
rmap walk hot page promotion,
demotion etc
==============================================================
Platform hints NUMAB NUMAB=1 Locality based
(AMD IBS) balancing and
NUMAB=2 hot page
promotion
==============================================================
Device hints NUMAB NUMAB=2 hot page
promotion
==============================================================
The last two are listed as possibilities.
Feel free to correct/clarify and add more.
Regards,
Bharata.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists