[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250205092721.9395-12-bhe@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:27:20 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ryncsn@...il.com,
chrisl@...nel.org,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] mm/swapfile.c: remove the incorrect code comment
Since commit eb085574a752 ("mm, swap: fix race between swapoff and
some swap operations"), the non_swap_entry() checking has been taken
off from function __swap_duplicate(). Hence, in the kernel-doc comment,
the line 'swp_entry is migration entry -> EINVAL' is obsolete. Remove
that line to avoid misleading people.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 93fd12c12bba..12bb7556c7f1 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -3525,7 +3525,6 @@ void si_swapinfo(struct sysinfo *val)
* Returns error code in following case.
* - success -> 0
* - swp_entry is invalid -> EINVAL
- * - swp_entry is migration entry -> EINVAL
* - swap-cache reference is requested but there is already one. -> EEXIST
* - swap-cache reference is requested but the entry is not used. -> ENOENT
* - swap-mapped reference requested but needs continued swap count. -> ENOMEM
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists