linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] perf symbol: Add rust v0 demangling support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=ynvE9k2=78wsVoM5-YVFBhTfNCKBeW7SOrNasPdihzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 13:59:32 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>, 
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf symbol: Add rust v0 demangling support

On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 6:20 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I think the best solution is to use the official demangler but in
> general we'd like fewer rather than more library dependencies. For

I agree, solution 4) seems the best, at least for the time being.

Cheers,
Miguel