lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6cfcd262-0fe4-4398-999c-ade674191edf@p183>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:11:28 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: inline getname()

[cc lists and people]

> +static inline struct filename *getname(const char __user *name)
> +{
> + return getname_flags(name, 0);
> +}

This may be misguided. The reason is that if function is used often enough
then all those clears of the second argument bloat icache at the call sites.
Uninlining moves all clears in one place, shrinking callers at the cost of
additional function which (in this case) tail calls into another function.
And tailcalling is quite efficient (essentially free):

	getname:
		xor esi, esi
		jmp getname_flags

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ