linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add compatible for CSOT PNA957QT1-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W0jvGESB59f_Hnz3tL8y37YdX77nx0hO+e0KK5TngPpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:17:38 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, airlied@...il.com, 
	simona@...ll.ch, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, 
	tzimmermann@...e.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add compatible for
 CSOT PNA957QT1-1

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:13 AM Langyan Ye
<yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
>
> Add a new compatible for the panel CSOT PNA957QT1-1. This panel uses
> HX83102 IC, so add the compatible to the hx83102 binding files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/himax,hx83102.yaml        | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

I haven't personally run this through DT validation, but this looks
good to me from a visual inspection.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

I would assume this lands through the drm-misc tree and it'll meet up
with the vendor-prefix patch in mainline. That'll cause a temporary
schema validation error in drm-misc but I think that's OK, right? I
also wouldn't personally object to this landing through the DT
bindings tree. As a simple drm-misc committer I'm not sure I have the
official authority to ack that, but I've given my blessing for stuff
like this in the past and haven't been yelled at yet.

For now, I'll wait for a DT maintainer to give it a review and guidance.

-Doug